Talk:Battle of Kyiv (2022)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Kyiv (2022) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Battle of Kyiv (2022). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Battle of Kyiv (2022) at the Reference desk.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2022. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia: Military / Politics and law High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
	This article is supported by the politics and law of Russia task force.

Ukraine High‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Kyiv Offensive (2022) was copied or moved into Battle of Kyiv (2022). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 December 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add a Ukrainian unit that took part during the defence of kyiv in 2022 to the infobox. It's the dzjokhar dudayev battalion. Some sources that the battalion was there: https://kyivindependent.com/national/meet-the-chechens-fighting-russia-in-ukraine https://www.dw.com/en/chechen-and-tatar-muslims-take-up-arms-to-fight-for-ukraine/a-61174375 Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name from "battle of Kyiv" for "Battle for Kyiv"

I suggest that we change the name from "Battle of Kyiv" to "Battle for Kyiv". The reasoning behind this change, is due to the nature of the battle. For Russia the objective of the battle was to capture Kyiv whereas for the Ukrainians, it was to defend and keep control of the capital. Therefore it was a battle 'for' the control of the capital. When 'of' is used it signifies merely the location of a battle. One example is the Battle of Agincourt, named so, because the battle took place at the village of Agincourt. In this case it's not only a battle at Kyiv, it's a battle for Kyiv. Therefore, to be precise in our language I suggest we change the name to "Battle for Kyiv". Danicus Politicus (talk) 14:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntary withdrawal?

Speaking on Saturday, Putin said that Ukraine was responsible for sabotaging the negotiations. “After we pulled our troops away from Kiev – as we had promised to do – the Kiev authorities … tossed [their commitments] into the dustbin of history,” he said. “They abandoned everything.” https://archive.is/Gnple is this real ? Thisexistswelp (talk) 02:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, at least the Istanbul accords/negotiations should get mentioned.

~ Valentinianus I (talk) 08:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Careful Thisexistswelp. Questioning anti-Russian propaganda and disinformation on Wikipedia is completely forbidden. You will get banned if you mention anything remotely connected to reality. 217.21.155.119 (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lol Nicodene (talk) 00:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article is nonsense

This whole article is premised on propaganda and unsupported assertions. 142.181.220.202 (talk) 14:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've come to the same conclusion as you regarding "nonsense" but perhaps for different reasons. This article containts nothing particularly unique in the way of content and is, in my opinion, a prime target to be merged into the page Northern front of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]